The catalyst being tested now, that has completed 1000 hours, is being done under commercial standards and it is achieving better results than it did in the cleaner, earlier 2000 hour lab scenario, which was nearly optimal results. Again, you keep muddying the waters. Who cares about the lab results now that they are onto commercial testing with an outside company? They are achieving outstanding results and it's being done through an outside company (Emerging Fuels Technology). Do you think E.F.T. would allow Carbon Sciences to announce something that isn't true? I don't understand your logic, Ecomike, except that you are quite simply a contrarian.