Why do you fellows consistently and negligently ignore the SEC on these debunked conspiracy theories? Very foolhardy to adopt viewpoints that go contrary to what the SEC maintains.
Of course, the SEC must be part of this ....
"*** Others view the threat posed by “naked” short selling as wildly exaggerated, and point to instances in which allegations of abusive “naked” short selling were used to cover up other management malfeasance, like the dumping on the market of large blocks of unregistered shares. We have recently alleged such behavior in the widely-discussed CMKM Diamonds litigation. Other fraud defendants have also attempted to portray depressed stock prices as the work of clandestine short sellers. Despite its assertions regarding the potential danger of “naked” short selling and the growing interest in the subject, the Report can cite to no bona fide studies or empirical data regarding the practice’s market impact. The Division of Trading and Markets debunks the theory that NSS creates “counterfeit” or “phantom” shares. ***"
from:
SEC Report No. 450 March 18, 2009 Practices Related to Naked Short Selling Complaints and Referrals
20 WEEKS is fact re: AS last increased and certs issued by TA OS/AS is fact mgmt on record re: never selling one share is fact current mgmt holds restricted common shares is a fact diversification of product lines is a fact VOL AVGS in 2009 vs. 2011 is fact SS in 2009 vs. 2011 is fact 100M FLOAT in 2009 vs 1 BILLION FLOAT in 2011 is my guesstimate based on *documentation* of trades for well over 23 months :)
patiently biding my time but LMAO at the methodology that has been systematically dealing with the .0003s these past weeks .. truly curious what MM VFIN shows for the month of june .. when that report is out by finra .. a week from tomorrow ..