Replies to post #1759 on Digital Locations Inc (DLOC)

[DMI101]

Hi Ecomike,
As always I disagree with most of your opinions on cabn. I do agree that it would be nice to now the commercial facility name. You stated.

I am still concerned about the lack of actual data, and particularly concerned about the way he worded this last PR, claiming it now has 1000 test hours at "a commercial facility". All the prior PRs said they were running a "commercial test"

Here is a PR from 05/23/11. It clearly states COMMERCIAL FACILITY in the headline.So not all prior PRs state commercial testing.
http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/company-news-story.aspx?storyid=201105231602mrktwireuspr____0759392&title=carbon-sciences-announces-successful-testing-of-breakthrough-catalyst-in-commercial-facility.

As matter of fact I believe that when it is stated commercial testing it is exactly that. Testing at the commercial level.

and since a lab test using a commercial feed was the next logical step), using what I would call a commercial feed, versus a lab grade feed, note that lab grade chemicals are extremely pure, unlike industrial (commercial) grades, and one of the industry concerns would be catalyst poisoning by traces of junk in the commercial CH4/CO2 feed mix which would be too costly to remove

And can you please enlighten me on how you know how ETF does it's testing, or is this just a guess.

for the eventual bad news in the next 10-Q, which will reveal the latest round of dilution and its cost.

And this last quote is just your opinion . We all will have to wait and see. I truely believe Byron is still sticking to his plan to uplist.IMO I know it won't be soon. But who knows.GLTU

[maybe_this_time]

Good to have the voice of a rational informed man. I think I remember seeing this change to producing fuel with a natural gas / CO2 feed is relatively new. Could there be a lot more start up costs before this is ready for the big time? I've been shedding some of speculative plays that look to be in short term trouble with a weakening economy (please disregard the three pinks I post on, lol), probably doesn't make sense to take on anything new at this point...

Thanks Eco.

[littleatatime]

As always you are simply looking for something to doubt. The truth is it is plain and simply just good news.

In addition, your drumbeat goes on regarding your concern of dilution. Carbon Sciences is not diluting their shares willy nilly. You make it sound as if they are out to rip you off. Unlike most penny stocks who do dilute and do rip you off, Carbon Sciences has an actual product measuring great results and until they prove unreasonable skeptics like yourself they have to fund their mission. It's that simple, they are funding their stated mission, not trying to get rich off of the small number of shares that you'll never buy anyway until it's too late. The reverse split was not dilution either; it's a step forward in preparation to uplist. The shares are going to have some price swings for a little while but overall they are going to stabilize and move up.

Take your raincloud elsewhere Ecomike. Why do you even follow this stock?