InvestorsHub Logo

Surklyn

06/22/11 10:12 AM

#29667 RE: frontloading #29664

I'm right. Even if there were just a few slots, and those slots were making money enough to cover costs and turn a profit then the slot parlor is viable. Again, it is irrelevant how many slots are in the parlor if the parlor is making money.. Which it has been stated it is. This slot parlor is not a game changer for CGAQ.. It is a revenue stream for which CGAQ can undertake other larger projects. Roberto has already said the parlor isn't up to capacity, and it's still being completed.

crookedneck

06/22/11 10:16 AM

#29668 RE: frontloading #29664

We are not here for what the slots parlor will do, we are here for all the potential deals that are being worked on and when a contract is signed you can wave bye bye to these lows. Point being, why worry so damn much about this slots parlor! I am sure glad Mr. Swank and Roberto are spending their time on the bigger deals that will really make this company. The way I see it is that the slots parlor will support itself and even bring in some revenues with very little cost to run it. Now it it would only be wise to slowly add machines along the way and soon they will get to a 100 machines if business dictates, so stop all the worries about small potatoes. JMHO

Cheers!

Chili Palmer

06/22/11 10:39 AM

#29674 RE: frontloading #29664

I agree with your viewpoint 100% on CGAQ's slot parlor and announcements and lack of answers.