Replies to post #97131 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[99leadballoons]

it's been
done for the past months as shares
have been *attempted* to be shaken
out .. and it's FAILED MISERABLY

Let's say that the silly wash trading theory was true (which it isn't). According to you they have failed at shaking any shares, yet you were able to double your holdings as well as "feet on the street", yet they havent shaken any shares loose doing the fictitious activity you speak of?

[99leadballoons]

and it's why <most likely> next wednesday's
10 day avg is revealing in its own right
and why come june 30th the volume and closing
pps on exph ~ should be interesting .. since
it is the eom and the eoq .. a two-fer so to speak

in the meantime .. i personally expect mgmt
to issue a PR .. based on not one but two
*material* events updated in june via their
website .. imo that comes b4 the eom as well

How did the EOM and EOQ theories work out???

How about the material events?

lmao

[AStTropaz]

What difference does management PR's make when they never back it up with filed revenues or actual fulfillments?! I think they have lost a lot of credibility with a lot of shareholders by what I read.

in the meantime .. i personally expect mgmt
to issue a PR .. based on not one but two
*material* events updated in june via their
website .. imo that comes b4 the eom as well