We will all defer to our resident Legal Eagle in this or any other case. However, this may be more of a semantics issue than factual. I am a little confused by DRCAL's statement because it seems to say two different things. It may simply reflect his understanding of the proceedings but because of how the statement is worded it is questionable to me whether he actually believes their is a Judgement entered in plaintiffs favor. If it were me, I might question the choice of words but not the integrity of the speaker in this or any other case. And the only reason this topic has merit as it relates to DGRI is to make the point that DRCAL believes that in comparison to the government, DGRI's integrity is far greater. This all the time I can afford to spend on this.