If you couldn't tell (and I'm not surprised you couldn't), Duke was being ironic. The post was meant to highlight the improbability of any of CDIV's claims. Of course, it is no longer a matter of conjecture since the SEC investigated the company and suspended trading because of the false, misleading and incomplete information released by Nasir and his band of promoters, including Monk.
As far as I know that is still the goal and as you know Apple growth is off the charts.
What would be the better investment if Apple's growth is off the charts:
1) Apple
or
2) A 1-man shell company, suspended by the SEC for releasing questionable information about that they *really* do, run by a failed real estate agent with no experience or knowledge in software development, with a CEO who has bankrupted each of the last 4 companies he's run, and who only buys cheap apps that nobody else wants to re-sell?
Yeah, if one had ten million dollars, what could be better than spend it all on a suspended company with a negligible revenue stream and a dismal product line?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
