Replies to post #38164 on AppTech Payments Corp (APCX)

[jmurfk]

So my relation is the same as yours

I don't think anyone has the same relation with Eric as you do

cpw13154   Share
Wednesday, May 18, 2011 11:30:54 PM
Re: Joe Burmeister post# 37115 Post # of 38164 
Joe you have no idea how right you are. Lets just say I think we will see the answer to today in the next couple of days. And once we do you might be upset that you even passed on .0003's.I do hear from Eric almost every day.Not much sense putting any of it out for ovious reasons on this board.Usually he gets back to me late at night as the letter I got today was from 3:00am. And your also right about the selling of 200 million shares and yet the PPS never went to .0001. Common sense tells you its part of a deal.I think when we do hear you will be able to pat yourself on your back.GLTY

I really can't beleive how anyone didn't think he was going to use the shares to grow the buisness.

Nobody bought this thinking he would dilute like he has, except you. Stock market 101, get best entry. Now, do you really think the longs flowed in thinking the OS would more than double in 6 months, or go over 75 times in less than a year, lol. I think not.

Also, AS changed in July 2010, and many folks bought .01s from then into August when the first huge dilution hit. .01 to a low of .0004 it went, in a day.

You think those folks bought .01s hoping for heavy dilution?

As for keeping some reserve, that's smart business.

[benosufan]

"As for diluting and him saying not to worry about it I think I am right as to what he meant and that he knew the PPS would suffer but when everything started to fit into place revenues would bring this company over the top."

So say I went and robbed a bank for $500,000. Later on the cops question me since I am a suspect and I say "no, there is no concern about me robbing the bank. I am just borrowing the cash to buy this supposedly multi-million dollar business that is basically the same as many others already on the market. I will certainly return the money back to the bank when I see fit. But as for now, there is no concern for me stealing the money".

Does this sound familiar? He said "there is no concern for dilution". Two weeks later he admitted in the interview he was diluting. So isn't that misleading, he said no then yes. For those two weeks he continued to pound the pps down with 50 million even 100 million blocks of shares under the bid. How can you twist what he said into anything other than a lie? In my mind it was like he stole that money from those buyers. Just my opinion but these are the facts.

[oilin07]

I wish the investment community agreed with you because we would be sitting on a higher stock price.

[PRmaniac]

cpw13154 - that piece of APCX is getting smaller and smaller and smaller, in terms of percentage of the entire share structure.

Nothing like seeing an investment lose potential value each and every month. This is business as usual with pinkies like this that dilute after claiming no concern for dilution. The ink wasn't even dry before he dumped tons of shares of dilution.