InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DAC21

06/08/11 7:17 PM

#94567 RE: Mugwumps88 #94566

One would think Berlin Bio would have said something to this as well, unless they did and we all missed it.
icon url

now invest

06/08/11 8:01 PM

#94572 RE: Mugwumps88 #94566

Look back at the "stakeholder" comment. I think anyone doing DD should look at the definition of that word.. WHAT IS DOESN'T HAVE TO MEAN IS.... Equity holder.!!!

It simply means that we have a STAKE in the outcome!!! And I have interperted that from PR's and other postings... to mean What we get paid for our equity depends on the final approval of the Project AND perhaps the profability of it!!!!!

Then there were also statements saying that ongoind we would have some admistrative/advisory role...

I think it has been clear WE SOLD OUR EQUITY STAKE!!! But the deal is dependent on the outcome of the Berlin project!!

I don't find that confusing!! Add the fact that many entities were attacking the PROJECT, there seems to be a ND agreement so that people couldn't add more Stupid arguments to the hearings.
on who was going to make what. Good move IMO!!!!!!!!!


icon url

Grozny

06/08/11 9:24 PM

#94587 RE: Mugwumps88 #94566

I think the fact that this has never been formally addressed could certainly be the issue and once clarified, will rectify the current issue.