You posted the following and have alluded to it many times before.
Other than the fact that it is absurd to post something like this when we constantly have CEO's of Multi Billion dollar companies who run them into bankruptcy and then walk away with golden parachutes worth hundreds of millions of dollars. I bet these guys "tried real hard" too. They still had no obligation to deliver, or any consequences at all.
Anyway, I figured that the sec filings would give me the information I needed to prove you wrong. Again.
Indemnity is often used as a synonym for compensation or reparation.
As a legal concept, it has a more specific meaning, namely, to compensate another party to a contract for any loss that such other party may suffer during the performance of the contract. For instance, compensation connotes merely a sum paid to make good the loss of another without regard to the payer's identity or their reasons for doing so. As the following paragraphs should explain, an indemnity is a sub-species of compensation, in the same way that Damages and reparation are.
I am not a lawyer, but I would bet that if Renfro fails to complete then BRZL would suffer a loss. That loss would be the 480 million shares. Therefore, I would think the return of those shares would satisfy the indemnity clause in the contract. I may be wrong about that, but I'll stand by it until you can provide documentation that it is not true.