InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #8389 on Cat House
icon url

9bruce

06/08/11 11:21 AM

#8391 RE: texkengold #8389

Tex, Gary, you are spot on

I too am all pissed to hell and back. There is a consideration here. The reps have undertaken to represent and in theory and indeed practice they have an obligation to do so. This is not a game. We could have sold weeks ago at a much higher price than we could ever get now.
With that in mind, I have contacted them by Email and laid out what we want and what we want to hear. They deserve to know how we feel, though by the look of things, there aren't many of us left, AND they deserve to know what we expect . Or at this stage hope!

I have a lot more to be pissed about, which I would not discuss, but do give me pause.

At this stage and so far, I do want to state PUBLICLY. I STILL SUPPORT JEFF AND JAMES WITH ALL THINGS DISCUSSED. As I have said oft before, "No more BS, time to finalize".
B.
icon url

Anvil

06/08/11 11:32 AM

#8392 RE: texkengold #8389

Tex, really not my place to comment, having sold my shares. BUT, if you want answers, IMO, Owens is the guy. Yes, the reps have stepped into the mix. but what do they have? Do they have the money to hire an attorney to draft the NDA, set up the trust, execute the exchange?

Given the arm's length transaction, my guess is that Owen's can't pay for it or even Jeff for that matter. So a question for the reps would be; Have you hired an attorney? who is paying for it? do you need money from shareholders?

And then, yes, given the agreement yesterday, what is the plan and timing. IMO, there should have been a plan based on the various outcomes of yesterday hearings. 1) Jeff wins, 2) Jeff loses and 3) Continuation.

But really, nothing that happened yesterday should impact the drafting on an offer to present to centa.