Replies to post #96504 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

what isn't understood here?

the info is entered under both the business
name and the personal *guarantor* .. which
would be brown/harrs

why the state of NC does the personal via
a different no. vs the business no. is an
issue to be taken up with them ~ the info
runs a month apart <business/personal> which
if one has interest can also be taken up with
the state of NC

the point that actually matters .. is *BENEFACTOR*
was terminated back in 2008 .. ironically because
crestmark gave a better rate

again what matters is that the *lapse* date had
zero to do with what was originally posted about

==

all legit co.s come public jerry to access capital
and *GROW* .. expo holdings was no different

however while on the *poorly watched* OTC >>> all
legit co.s are subject to *predators* who orchestrate
runs and requisite shorting to the cellar

it's the rare co. that can survive this attn and still
succeed ..

the exception to the *profit for destruction* will be
EXPO HOLDINGS

<one of> the reason/s is due to the local lowes connections

which are hiding in plain site

edit>>> btw .. the tactics i'm posting about have zero
to do with XXXXX .. rather it's *connected* to the
*orchestrated runs and requisite short to the cellar*


==
4kids
all jmo