Replies to post #26195 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[geob]

Thank GOD your around....

ANN441j

GEO

[frogdreaming]

Ann441j, I am not going to play that game my dear, Sorry.

I am not going to be responsible for dredging up old PR's and newsletters, simply because my memory is better than yours or you were not around here during those days.

I am also not interested in providing a 'defense' of everything I say, just because you or George or someone else doesn't like it.

I am not in the business of trying to change your mind or your inclination and frankly I am not in the least bit concerned about your opinion, and so I have very little incentive to do your homework for you.

If YOU wish to challenge the statement, then feel free to do so, but realize that you will need to provide some authentication yourself.

There are enough 'old timers' around here, who remember the claims from back then, to point you in the right direction, if you are really interested and not just playing games.

regards,
frog

[mikenickels]

Every body that was into the stock in those days ( as I was, from the first year DNAP opened ) remembers Frudakis talking about the 6 month multi-product a year pipeline.

Nothing to talk about. They haven't come close, on a scientific techinical level to what they were boasting they could achieve. Maybe with more money they could. Maybe they can be successful without achieving the original vision. But Frudakis was definitely talking about coming out with multiple products a year.. I don't have a link off the top of my head, nor do I have time to look for one. But Frog is right on.

To understand what good things the company might achieve in the future, it doesn't help to pretend that they have always been right on target. They have not. Not in the business plan, and not in the technology plan either. Why do you think we are looking at a 10/1 RS?

[Miss Scarlet]

Ann441j ~

I do remember that as being an objective Frudakis was shooting for.

Warm Regards,

[loch3]

Ann; I remember Doc T's ref. to product every six months, but I don't recall that it was a promise. I think I printed out copy of the statement, and I'll try to find it tonight. The archives on line do not go that far back, so hopefully I still have the copy. With all the efforts that you provide us with your research, I'd love to assist you if I can. If not, perhaps someone else still has a copy...that is someone who does not mock your question.