Take a wild guess what public P2O company owns this:
Everyone is taking a 'guess'...it'll come out sooner or later
In the Instant Matter, Plaintiff Laws contends that all Defendants have engaged in conduct which has acted, intentionally or otherwise, to hide, confuse and/or mislead the general public (including Plaintiff Laws) as to the true identity of their corporate structure. All defendants use of DCL Solutions, DCL Solutions, Inc., PakIt, Pak-It, LLC, Dickler Chemical Laboratories, Inc., Dickler Chemical Laboratories of Florida, Inc., etc. interchangeably has perpetuated the confusion. In addition, it does not appear that Moving Defendants have amended and/or updated their Pennsylvania Corporate Registrations to make their corporate structure, names and/or identities clear. Where courts have addressed the liability of a parent corporation in the context of employment discrimination, most have declined to dismiss the corporate parent ....[snip]
Thus, Plaintiff Laws requests that Moving Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be stayed until Plaintiff has time to engage in discovery regarding the corporate structure and/or ownership of her employer, DCL Solutions a/k/a DCL Solutions, Inc. In particular, Plaintiff Laws requests time to take the deposition testimony of John Bordynuik, Stephen Seneca and/or Ron Kurp....