you raise some interesting and, i think, valid points. I know that not all naked shorting can be eliminated. Yet, I do believe through name changes and dividends some or much ns will be reduced.
However, I've always believed that the BEST way to limit naked shorting is through real valuation, not speculative valuation. RAMO appears to be headed in that direction. I agree that when subsequent filings demonstrate real revenues, then shorting will be more within the normal parameters one might typically see on the bigger boards. Heck, without shorts, how would we have short squeezes, right? The ying and the yang are needed, but again, within tolerable ranges that precipitate a stock trading around its real valuation.
I don't claim to be an expert, just know enough to have an intelligent and informative discussion LOL
Thanks for your substantive post.
GFTY.