InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

genisi

05/27/11 1:36 PM

#120689 RE: biotech jim #120675

Master, don't you have these odds [odds of success in non-carrier near 60% and carrier around 25%] reversed?

I think he meant what he wrote because in phase II, the post-hoc ApoE4 subgroups analysis showed good efficacy only in non-carriers.
icon url

masterlongevity

05/27/11 9:12 PM

#120707 RE: biotech jim #120675

The ph 2 data showed a statistically significant benefit of bapineuzumab over PBO in the ApoE4 non-carrier population on almost every measure. The caveats are that this was a post-hoc analysis and the PBO decline was a little worse than historical average.

In the same post-hoc, bapineuzumab did not show benefit over PBO on ANY measure in the carrier population

Part of the retrospective rationale is that maybe the carrier population has a more aggressive disease and needs to be treated earlier.