Here is my response to comparison to SMT (Smart Technologies)...
I once worked at a small cap IB in 1989 in which we completed a secondary financing for Comverse Technology (CMVT) at .09 with approx 50mil shares outstanding = $4.5 mil valuation. Comverse had a voicemail technology platform.. However there were 3-4 big players in that market such as Boston Technology ..i believe the symbol was BSTN on the NASDAQ a $35 stock at the time.
Years later CMVT bought Boston Tech along with 3-4 other competitors.
CMVT's valuation went from $5mil in 1989 to $20 BILLION prior to tech wreck in 2000 ...That's 4,000 times your $ in 11 years.. a $10,000 investment if held from low to high was worth $40 MILLION.
Boston Tech was heavily leveraged with long term debt , SMT has over $600mil long term debt, which affects them greatly in a slow Q.
Anything is possible here for the long term, TUCN has no long term debt.. This is a growing industry.. we've gone from blackboards to whiteboards to iwb's, however we are very early in worldwide market penetration.. TouchIT has top quality products and technology for a reasonable price, which is why HITATCHI has contracted them.
It's managements expertise and how they manage their growth that will make us rich in the process