Replies to post #95358 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Santa Barbara Broker]

it's literally *irrelevant*

Let's reduce that to writing so it can be examined in the sense it is being declared "irrelevant". What factual part of correcting the R/S filing found below is "literally irrelevant"?

1) The fact the management either misled or lied to their shareholders about the ability to actually correct the form by filing a superceding correction filing?

2) The fact that they filed the R/S form to begin with? On a form which was clearly and specifically different from the A/S filing form as pointed out by Mr. Gleason from the NV SOS?

3) The fact that the company on three specific occasions has stated or implied that there is absolutely no chance whatsoever of a reverse split, it has never been under consideration and there were no plans for an A/S increase? When in fact they performed the first in a series of 1.35 BILLION additional share issues within four weeks after stating there would be no further dilution and then shortly after the end of THAT, filed a form to perform a reverse split?

4) The fact that management has apparently received the correction amendment filing form not once but twice from a concerned shareholder, has failed to acknowledge it or file it but continues to insist no R/S is under consideration?

Exactly what part of a management team continually misleading and lying to it's shareholders qualifies as "irrelevant"? Would this trait that Expo Holdings has exhibited almost since formation be one of another unbelievably near actionable acts of misrepresentation of material events that are "acceptable and expected" of "hard working, moral and honest men of great integrity" because of the market they trade on? Is this deceiptful behavior "acceptable" because shareholders are supposed to understand that when a company representative states uncategorically that no reverse split is under consideration, that a savvy investor automatically is suppose to assume only the opposite is true and expected...because EXPH trades on the pink sheets? Is that part of good, solid EXPH "DD"? Knowing that the company will constantly PR and state in updates the false and exact opposite of what they plan to do, LOL? All IMHO.

[patchman]

You are right - in a *T-Squared* mode of operations, it is best to make shareholders as confused as possible.