Replies to post #335156 on Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

[patchman]

I think you are mistaken. there are government agencies that are there as regulators of everything. Our government is responsible for crime prevention at state and federal levels but people still sue in civil court without the assistance of government agencies. Fraud, theft, personal injury are all handled at personal levels and without the expectation that the government will do the job for you.

The shareholders of Spongetech has a civil fraud claim they allege. it is their, and not the government's, responsibility to prove that claim. if proven these shareholders can sue the accused and the government if they choose. This is not criminal fraud the shareholders claim, this is civil fraud and thus civil restitution is based on civil claims brought by those cheated.

shareholders in SPNG INVESTED based on an expectation of a short squeeze not on fundamentals and they are now receiving the rewards of poor due diligence.

[ozz112]

What even more disturbing than that, these shareholders have not failed to act as they are paying for several government agencies to make sure that "naked shorting" does not occur.

haha...if you guys are so convinced of NSS, then pay to have an official count and you will be paid back 100's times what u pay for the count, but instead you guys sit back and are going to watch revocation occur. The fact is if any of you believed in your claims of NSS, this count would have taken place already. That's easy money in the bank if you are right.