With respect I am not blinded by anger, nor am I blinded by the rubbish that some post on here.
As ever they have promoted a "possible" "could" and "should" PR. There is nothing of substance. Molen is allegedly visiting these sites with experts, surely he can't claim to be an expert in this highly specialist field can he?
What are they paying these experts with? Even their own Directors were shafted recently over shares they were paid for services rendered. What "expert" in such a field of high demand is going to align himself to this shonky little outfit?
If he is paying them for all the months of time they have spent on developing this - remember it is almost two years since the clown came up with this ruse - why does nothing show on the financials?
As for "different" I would prefer that is was something that could be substantiated, but of course we both know this will never happen.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
