Replies to post #94991 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[AStTropaz]

"exact name and phone number of attorney please." OMG!!! Where is this information?? Why is there deflection? SPECIFICS?! Maybe some will call?! OMG, OH MY GOODNESS!! EXPO EXPOSED!!!! Generic BS?! Call 911 or 411 and ask for: Mr. You Know How I Mean?! WOWZA!

[fourkids_9pets]

veno

some rather revealing news came out yesterday
re: PENSON ... a *neutral* observer might see
some specifics as to why over 5 pages of co.s
<including expo holding> were *listed* as of
5/2 .. ironically the list contains co.s that
are fully filing as well as unregistered co.s

i'd expect more *revelations* due to penson's .. er .. woes

like i said .. i warned folks in 2009 due to *rumors* swirling then

non of this <penson> comes as a surprise

==
4kids
all jmo

[Santa Barbara Broker]

So I am sort of thrown back when you request a name and number...As far as that..no way..

When it is implied an answer was given about an Expo Holdings, Inc. subject of material interest to their shareholders (lack of FTD reporting) by an official attorney of a US Government agency and claims of a personal conversation are made and represented as being a proven FACT, it should not be unusual to honor the request for the phone number and name of the person spoken with. The attorney is (presumably) a public official and answerable to the general public for information they are disseminating about a public company.

Not only was the EXPH FTD information received not disclosed in a straight forward manner in clear, conclusive terms, the name and contact number is now being witheld. Is it not then understandable how the situation including the implied "answer" could seem entirely implausible? Post the FTD Expo Holdings, Inc. question(s) that were asked, the exact answers received and the contact information for anyone who would like to verify it. Once verified, I will personally request it be posted as a sticky note to the board by SB. Simple request, simple procedure, end of discussion and no more questions. Otherwise it must be presumed the information is third party hearsay and completely unreliable due solely to lack of unbiased and vetted confirmation and that will end the EXPH FTD SEC attorney conversation as well. All IMHO.

SBB