No it hasn't, and I wasn't offering it as real, certified proof - but thanks for taking issue with the validity of this. Real debate has a way of making the truth or reasonableness of a thing, or its falsehood and bs-factor, more clear.
The fact that the 'email' text doesn't attempt to prove anything, or contain any specifics, only suggests the likelihood that it's a real email from Renfro, who we all know by now is keeping quiet until certain things are made public. Besides the near-certainty, if it is at all uncertain, that nervous and inquiring traders have been constantly emailing him for reassurances that news will be released an hour from now and that the sp will rocket to .25 or more today. Honestly, I've been way too patient with posters, ceo's, coming-news and share prices of various doomed stocks at times, when I guess the writing was on the wall that it was a Big Loser. But. The absence of hype, lofty promises, exaggerated claims, and outlandish manufactured stuff like another stock's 'RECEIVED BUYOUT OFFER FOR $1US PER SHARE!' - all suggest, when added to a lot of very good dd, suggestions and clever thinking, that the 'realities' of this company and it's management are actually believable.
The tone of the email and it's promise to update 'within a week' increases the likelihood of it being real, at least for me, because it is just specific enough to offer something without saying how or when, and just polite enough about the constant emails and calls for reassurance, without saying 'DON'T BUG ME!!' (which I would want to say), to be the words of a seasoned professional - rather than a phony blurb written by a scammer.
Then you might start by asking questions like, what is there to be gained by manufacturing an email reply that doesn't say much, and about which the poster himself doesn't say much. If you're going to lie, why not put a little more effort into it, go for the gusto, and embellish enough to trap yourself into revealing something foolish. Like my son sometimes does (he's young and kind of rash but we're working on that).
While we're at it, why not put a little effort into proving it's false, rather than just throw out the question implied in 'can't prove it'?? Well, I guess if you can't prove it's false, it's probably real. Simple logic.
I know, I know - most pinkies, as well as great, big NAZ and AMEX stocks have CEO's and others that lie, hide stuff and scam until the cows come home, though most people don't care about the lying as long as they make money off the stock. But that doesn't mean all of them lie until proven innocent, any more than people who claim they want to make the world better in some way are to be treated with suspicion until they prove endlessly that they really have good intentions.
This took way too much of my time, but it was fun.
Best
~R
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
