InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

oldberkeley

05/08/11 9:01 AM

#119601 RE: zipjet #119600

Zip-

"In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane.” -Oscar Wilde

:-)

icon url

turtlepower

05/08/11 9:18 AM

#119602 RE: zipjet #119600

You have the answers to A and B mixed up.
icon url

dumaflotchie

05/08/11 9:35 AM

#119605 RE: zipjet #119600

My answers: A) 12-15 B) 40-55


I know what you meant as regards a and b.

But you do seem to make a pretty good case for a long position with downside risk to $15 and upside gain to $55 :).

I assume you are making these estimates based purely on Lovenox with no consideration of capoxone or FoB?

IMO.....the present stock price at PE of 8, already factors in t-lovenox threat.

I would hope that MNTA is actively engaged in negotiation with new partners for FoB (and other) but also renegotiation with the present lovenox/capoxone agreements. There is no logical reason that they should not just benefit from sales irrespective of multiple generics. I believe there is compelling argument to renegotiate...........if they didn't try....that would be tantamount to fiduciary breach IMO.

They have the goods.......they have proved it......and the negotiating angle is that they can prove it again and again in the future. Who wouldn't want to give a little now to get so much in form of future partnerships in future??
icon url

linhdtu

05/08/11 11:13 AM

#119609 RE: zipjet #119600

Zip you're a-okay by me although we differ on at least two things.

I know we are both together in mnta and exel.

I am more optimistic on mnta than you are and I am a lot more skeptic on exel than you are.

icon url

genisi

05/08/11 4:29 PM

#119637 RE: zipjet #119600

Don't worry IJ, temporary loss of mind is a very common side effect among us posters on message boards. Sanity will resume spontaneously when you have logged out :)