Replies to post #18169 on Tivus, Inc. (TIVU)

[dmoinvest]

Well, if the company has actually received $357,000 from DT, it should show up on their financials. If Host has actually paid for their televisions (500) then they should show up on financials

The $357k may show up as revenue but will be offset by the cost of the TV's as an expense.

If Host has paid for their tv's direct (to manufacturers) then the transaction will not flow through Tivu's books. No revenue.

Revenue is one thing, profits and earnings are another. To say they should show up on the financials is like the wall flower showing up to the party. Nobody notices and nobody cares. (I don't mean to offend any with that comment, I was a wall flower too, lol).

The real opportunity for revenue and profits are in the shared ad $$$$. When Tivu shouts out about revenue it is not focused on TV sales, that is ancillary. The lift off as a revenue stage company (which they are not) will come when they start hitting ad revenue targets that are substantiated with audited financials(which they do not have).

Until then, we are still a pink and MOMO usually prevails. It will take at least a few more Q's to to see viable ad rev flow.

All IMHO.

D