Big Bucks, Certainly you won't note for the record that history with Laidlaw before the NHSEC has found discovery questions presented by Counsel for the public to be considered relevant. So I will. Are you suggesting for a minute that the new company, Berlin Station, should refer to anything presented by the public counsel to be irrelevant? That would be a very very interesting twist in what's happened historically now wouldn't it? Now why in their right mind would Berlin Station want to "buck" the "mother nature" in this docket when they haven't in the past EVEN if they felt it was irrelevant? By the way, do you really think Counsel for public hasn't significantly studied the relevance of the questions asked prior to?