InvestorsHub Logo
Replies to #41113 on One Step Ahead
icon url

SPARK

05/07/05 9:59 PM

#41115 RE: zeninvestor32 #41113

Nice one.
icon url

Jim Bishop

05/07/05 10:20 PM

#41116 RE: zeninvestor32 #41113

The issue.

- Is CMKX registered with the SEC under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Answer is YES and CMKX agrees.

- Is CMKX required to file reports? Answer is YES and CMKX agrees.

- Has CMKX filed the annual and quarterly reports? Answer is NO and CMKX agrees, albeit with new excuses including SOX, lost or missing documents, poor internal controls, bad legal advice, and whatever they've come up with in the last couple of days.

- The ONLY issue in question is what action is necessary now. Revocation or suspension. Pick one.


icon url

janice shell

05/07/05 11:54 PM

#41138 RE: zeninvestor32 #41113

Sigh...

first I was surprised that the judge ruled on the SEC's motion in limine without even having received cmkx's response.

The judge ruled on motions before the SEC submitted its motion in limine. As far as we know, she hasn't yet ruled on it.

You need to pay attention.
icon url

janice shell

05/07/05 11:54 PM

#41139 RE: zeninvestor32 #41113

How do you know that?

But what I really find unusual is that depositions on the witnesses have not occurred.
icon url

LMRI T/A

05/08/05 2:28 AM

#41163 RE: zeninvestor32 #41113

b honest ..

ur not really a lawyer at all r u?


eom