InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BigBake1

05/01/11 10:48 AM

#108193 RE: banyon #108191

Sure it is, it is like any wrecked car, the right amount of money will cause the owner to part with it at any time. There is no content to BEHL, even the address supplied is nothing more than office the size of 10 X 10, there is no actual operational business, no assets currently but plenty of debt sitting out there. But why should someone buy this dirty shell when there are better shells out there that are clean and can be used to grow a real business? Not only would the debt be a waste of money, but the tremendous amount of money being spent to clean this shell up and get it back to an usiable capital growth vehicle push it past a shell that is already clean.

But let's be realistic when talking about surging here, let's look at the trend to the last close on Friday, from .01X last year to a PPS that trades at NO BID or .0001. Not much to talk about on Fridays whole $150 traded, pathetic volume when no one is dumping shares to pay Notes Payable. Maybe someday they will update the share structure to reflect the true share structure here currently. But why should one expect them to be transparent when they continue to display an AS of 5 billion when the documentation shows they have an AS of 15 billion. Still showing that lack of transparency, which means it is still the same leadership involved conning people into buying shares by displaying old information.
icon url

prsch3259

05/05/11 12:40 PM

#108313 RE: banyon #108191

Banyon my sources tell me behl is scrambling trying to figure out how ccaj/rwe was actually able to execute a business plan and actually rewarded investors.

Too bad no one can sell their behl shares and invest in the company that actually has a headquarters and working capital
icon url

curber

05/05/11 8:32 PM

#108333 RE: banyon #108191

Kidding right?