InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockmasterflash

04/25/11 2:53 PM

#41363 RE: stockmasterflash #41361

BTW, didn't some of the reports from the shareholder meeting

claim Cohen himself would be representing IMGG before the FDA???

Sorry, I don't buy that MWE is done "for now" and will be coming back.

there's too much giving Dean the benefit of the doubt when it comes to these things that turn out to be very much opposed to what he led us to believe.

Nearly every post on here since the MWE announcement PR started from the standpoint that MWE was the driving force behind this submission and that they would be pushing it through the FDA. NOw we find out that MWE hasn't been on the scene for over 2 months.

Just look at the attacks on me when I posted about the claims being removed from the 8k.

icon url

Denunzio36

04/25/11 2:58 PM

#41366 RE: stockmasterflash #41361

I'm not surprised if that's the case. With how much they probably cost it's no wonder why we haven't heard of I3 needing to raise more capital. I bet they are working with MWE off and on so they can be as economical as possible with their limited funds.

I'd be more concerned why Dean isn't upfront about it. If this truly is the case, which I don't believe until I see valid proof, he needs to understand that when things are found out through the board (like the NSE letter) that don't come from his mouth are detrimental to us stockholders. And the many of you here smell the drop of blood in the water and feast.
icon url

Dodger Blue

04/25/11 3:33 PM

#41378 RE: stockmasterflash #41361

Who says that IMGG hasn't already hired another firm to go forward with? Perhaps a firm even more qualified. You don't know.
icon url

Jacquie

04/25/11 3:40 PM

#41380 RE: stockmasterflash #41361

An assumed deception.