InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PLAYER ONE

04/24/11 8:18 PM

#29735 RE: Seawave7 #29733

It is hard to do PE ratios without considering certain factors.
You are making straight assumptions on valuation and multiples using a basis of a regular company without the potential unknowns associated with this one. If there is 25% of actual cash in this company the effect of that alone would not apply and can't be calculated as your chart implies nor would the PE valuation. The ramifications of that scenario is impossible to gauge with any calculations at this time. Just is a wait and see what has actually happened there.
icon url

snow

04/25/11 2:43 AM

#29739 RE: Seawave7 #29733

SEA

Your evaluation seems based on rationality. I suspect fear will be the dominant factor.
icon url

Nigel9527

04/25/11 6:16 PM

#29767 RE: Seawave7 #29733

1. Fraud
2. Legit

The answer is 1.

Who cares the % of fraud? How to really justify the %? How long can the market rationally realize the % of fraud and value this stock fairly based on the % of fraud/legitamcy?

Your analysis is of no use at all.

Fruad = $2, Legit = $100~, even if only 20% fraud, which I believe so.

But the high short interest rate make cause a short squeeze and that makes another story.