InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TomSawyer

04/22/11 2:12 PM

#174100 RE: tattoo1 #174098

I don't know Tatoo. Don't you think it's strange that if soooooo many shorts existed here, that non have covered after the new Finra rules, etc?

I mean really.. be honest now.. isn't that a fair question to ask?

I also believed that there were tons of shorts/nss here at one time. The company even said there weren't any in their Q&A section. And to nbe honest, there hasn't been one ounce of proof that there are shorts here by those preaching a short squeeze.

Today I have a different view.. there is very little short/nss here, or none at all. The text I posted on my previous message provides a great explination on what could be happening here that gives many the false hopes that a massive short squeeze will happen.

The clues are all over the place:

* No actual proof shorts/nss exist.
* No sign of covering or massive short squeeze.
* No sign of covering even after the famous FINRA 2/28 date..

"Between now and Monday, February 28th be prepared for panicked short sellers who cannot make delivery to try every trick in the book to buy back their short positions."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60354011&txt2find=FINRA


* We are plagued by possible "Cellar Boxing", and constant "Share Exchanges".
* When 100% Short Volume exists for a day, someone would need to sell before a short can buy. Why doesn't the sell volume (non-short) show up? Read my previous post.
* The fantasy that people here who are concerned are realy shorts, is just that another fantasy. IMO these people are just upset to be stuck in a stock which after many years has not delivered what it promised, and are stuck here. They are mistakened for shorts.


Again, we need raise hell to get this to happen. If we sit here, NMGL won't ever deliver anything.

Pressure on the company to perform needs to happen.