Replies to post #25333 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[ole vern]

ole vern, I'm sure you realize to what level of esteem I hold you in, and therefore how much I am impacted by your opinion.


***I'm quite sure you don't shive a git what others think
of your eloquent bashing, just as long as you feel you have
adequately done the job***


However, if you wish to chide me for 'selectively excerpting' from reports and concentrating on the negative side, then I am sure you are equally opposed to the inverse practice of only posting the positive aspects of those same reports as it is practiced by so many others.


***Exactly what would you have everyone do, post only on the
negatives? What kind of board would that be? How long before
the board would be gone? I think we are all well aware of the
inherent dangers in choosing to invest (gamble) in OTC stocks.
We already know the risks involved. Since we are armed with this knowledge I would presume most of us are here to seek out and discuss the positive aspects, not keep harping on the negatives****

I am amused by your behavior. Did you read the report yourself, see the disturbing aspects, realize that since it was counter to the prevailing opinion that I would pounce on it, and so you lay in wait for me to react? lol


***I'm glad to afford you a bit of amusement. And no, I didn't
have to "lay in wait". You are so consistent in your negative
reactions you are entirely predictable****


I wonder why, given your immediate realization of the pertinence of the issue, that you didn't share it with the board in order to initiate an unbiased discussion. Instead you kept quiet and hoped to turn it from a concern, into a tool to confront me with. Talk about twisting the facts to meet your own agenda. Isn't that a form of 'selective exerpt'? lol

regards,
frog


***Hey, I didn't have to bring anything to the board's attention. It was there for everyone to read and interpret. I felt no particular need to point out specifics. However, you felt driven to pounce on that one paragraph in order to further portray DNAP (and I suppose other OTC stocks) in a negative light. Good show, Froggie****