Matt is a share holder just like the rest of us and his rewards will be on his own hands as to what he makes of this company.
So you think he is going to sell some/alot of his shares to get his salary, what a novel idea, LOL... don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with that, he does deserve to prosper as well, people here say he doesn't receive a paycheck that in of itself is commendable by any means, but for these pennies that is a novel idea, why can't they all do it to benefit, instead of dilute to oblivion, where as by dilution the CEO/insiders are the only ones to profit. this way we all profit. NICE... if thats the way it works out. I have wondered for years why can't they all do it this way? is there an SEC regulation prohibiting this that Matt has found a way around I know they have to file stating so but still they all should do it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
