That is like saying Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny is real.
Until this "DD" makes it onto the financial statements (i.e. - assets, inventory, purchase commitment disclosures, etc), then it isn't real.
If the lack of including such things as the Picasso within the financial statements and notes has been an oversight by EV, then that is just as bad and will have its own consequences.
The game is over. This is a publicly traded company that has a fiduciary duty to provide their investors with insight into where they think ARTs is going and prove it with execution (financial results, disclosures, etc). It is also the company's right not to provide the answers to the questions that all of us have been asking, but they can't then expect to have investors continue throwing their hard earned money at this POS. The track record on this POS is abysmal (2 RS splits in 2 years (the last being 24,000 to 1 – I still can’t fathom how anyone can say 24,00 to 1 without gagging); boarder line no bid in just 4 months after the last RS; loose PRs that never amount to anything; etc.)