InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DDHOUND

04/13/11 2:08 PM

#127531 RE: Teague #127530

All your questions are answered by the DD on this board. Plus you can call company. Over the years you can not point to one lie they have told. They have always been forthcoming.
icon url

redmoose

04/13/11 2:12 PM

#127535 RE: Teague #127530

You have a couple of legitimate points there Teague and a few that are wide of the mark.

Yes - more information about the acquisition would be helpful and will, I believe, be forthcoming.

Trading restrictions have been covered at length on the board here - including very recently.

The practicalities about getting the gold out of the ground is a bit of a red herring topic. The report published yesterday goes into that in detail. It is not necessary for every partner to driver a loader or swing a pick to participate in a project.
icon url

chakkrapadt

04/13/11 3:03 PM

#127556 RE: Teague #127530

Did you even read the report? I think it lays out pretty clearly how the operations are going to proceed. I already told you how many shares are outstanding but you can go to the OTC Markets website and get it yourself.

Shares Outstanding 1,100,257,274 a/o Apr 07, 2011

That's from a couple of days ago so I'd venture to say that's pretty recent numbers and includes the 250 million restricted shares for this deal.

BTW, asking questions is not slander. But this can be:

if this was a real company with real prs this would never pull back.

thats where you are wrong, this has just found another way to hustle you, scam you, etc. there is nothing substantial here. and least in a q stock you cannot get diluted like this is.

every new investor who comes here is going to read these inflated figures about the gold thats going to be produced, new acquisition, etc, and it is all a bunch of bs. there will never be any gold pulled from the ground atthis "mine." period. i question if Oakbridge even exists in the capacity that INIX claims.


Your report is a hype report.



There are a couple more I could throw on here but I believe this is enough. Either way, I'm still waiting for your response to the DD comparison you requested.