Replies to post #96215 on RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[ThSeeker]

What is my take? So far Gene has continued to conduct business as usual. That means contracts that some how disappear. Makes claims that are never achieved. We have several longs that take morsels of info and extrapolate it the awesome category or worse into 50,000% to 500,000% potential pps gains.

You see how ridiculous that is? Especially based on history of IWS that back in its heyday when things were booming they had only a few contracts a year and revs in low million range. And now things are still tough in construction land and people expect this thing to blow. Get real. It is one thing to hope it starts to recover it is another to jump to the ridiculous. How insane.

I am sure even if they product a contract remember now we have billions of dilution to absorb any earnings so $.10 to $1 will not come easy. Remember that is 50,000% - 500,000% gains. Stupid and irresponsible predictions. They can't even get a lawsuit going or the shares trading in a normal fashion.

[wjbatt07]

We need more concrete facts to back up the .50 claim.

Wyatt is saying .10 in the near term. And another is saying 1.00.

Can you please explain the lack of volume here? Can you also explain why we haven't received an update about RCCH on the website in over a month, and via a an actual PR in several months?
Where is the first filing of just one of the three lawsuits? Where are the financials? Do you know where these documents are and believe they will be released, not very soon, but this week and that is why you are saying .50?

[Castell]

I agree! I'll give them 1 mill @ .50, the rest will be higher, maybe even $5.00 each. so .50 is a deal! :)

[EarnestDD]

RCCH volume drying up. The faithful few no longer buying. New rules had little if any effect .... Gene, back to cowardly hiding behind a Gagged Transfer Agent with no financials.
jmo