I never said I was an advisor to SNK, did I? I was answering the question some LONGS were asking........Why would SNK sell?
I was merely giving my side of the arguement. It has been suggested by some that SNK won't sell for a loss, has it not?
SNK bought warrants @.28, when the pps was above $1.00. Those shares had a 90 day restriction left when Carl WHINED to the SEC about the PROMO. They could/would have sold that summer for a PROFIT. SNK is not the investment group LONGS portray them to be. You yourself posted that the SEC is seeking an injuction against one of their principle's. The SEC is seeking to stop their PUMP and DUMP ways.
In case you didn't know SNK is down about 95%, or $16MM. I stand by that quote.
Implying they may sell.....not that they would sell. I have said more than once I don't know if they will, but have listed reasons why I believe they will. Just because the pps didn't go below a penny yesterday doen't mean SNK is not selling, or the pps won't drop further.
Did Carl say GKG would generate $20MM in feed......or just imply it?
Carbon neutral marketing and plans of action are called schemes. I don't get your point?
I also stand behind the point about Carl and Chang. If they believe in this PLAN OF ACTION(scheme).......forgo your salaries and take the May payment off the table.
We shall see........right?
I hope that answers whatever questions you may have about your FAVS of mine...........