You have countered your own logic. You thought htymp was going to be a hit simply because Eric aquired it? And then when he let it go , that meant that he tricked you into being wrong? This is getting pretty silly.
First of all , you didn't think it was going to be a hit simply because Eric got it. You did your own research and you decided that all by yourself. Secondly, by Eric letting the film go to someone else, he essentially unaquired it, and therefore earned your trust as an invester by making the right judgement and not putting it out. If he had simply went ahead doggedly, and just proceded with blinders on, and rigidly refused to stray from any set course, simply because it might cause someone like you to get all bent out of shape about it, would that have been more preferable? Is he supposed to be playing to the peanut gallery?
I sure hope he wouldn't be.
Would it have been better if he had put out htymp, girlfriend, moebius, wild hunt,etc..., all last year, rolled the dice, and hope he didn't crap out? Is that how you would run a business, at any stage?
You see, he can aquire as many films as he wants to, but it's nice for him to also have the option of not being so tied to any one project, that it can serve as an anchor, that could potentially bring the whole company down.
Why would you actually complain about that?
Just remember. Just like a film can be aquired. It can also be un-aquired. And that is a good thing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
