News 
Market Data 
Discover
Replies to post #12710 on Petro America - Kansas Corporation
03/31/11 9:15 PM
nodummy Share Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:45:53 AM
Re: SnoopyPal post# 8621 Post # of 12713
Regarding Chozan Behn's public court records
I had checked San Diego a while back he had several older cases there from the 1990s.
He had these 2 small claims judgments against him and a 3rd case that the Professional Business Trade Bureau filed against him that I could find no further details about. Here are the links for those 3 cases:
http://courtindex.sdcourt.ca.gov/CISPublic/casedetail?casenum=S582127&casesite=KM&applcode=C
http://courtindex.sdcourt.ca.gov/CISPublic/casedetail?casenum=S638647&casesite=KM&applcode=C
http://courtindex.sdcourt.ca.gov/CISPublic/casedetail?casenum=L545900&casesite=SD&applcode=C
He also had several personal family disputes (looked like a pretty messy divorce).
San Bernardino County:
Looks like he spent some time in jail for both of those convictions. He'll be off parole in January 2011.
Also several traffic violations
Orange County:
Just some more traffic violations and more personal family issues.
Los Angeles County:
California Penal Code Section 32: Accessory After the Fact
California Penal Code Section 476A(a): Nonsufficient Funds/Checks
California Penal Code Section 487(a): Grand Theft
Judging by the information available it looks like he pleaded guilty to Penal Code 32 and as part of the plea deal the other two charges were dismissed. Not sure if he was sentenced to any jail time for this one. They want money to view the documents.
Riverside County:
Case TES035737 (8/28/09) - JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR MONIQUE GUILLORY, APRIL RODRIGUES AND AGAINST DEFENDANT CHOZAN BEHN IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000.00 PLUS COSTS OF $100.00
Case RIS169823 (3/8/05) - DEFAULT JUDGMENT (SMALL CLAIMS) ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FILED 11/15/2004 OF MELISSA RUHL AGAINST CHOZAN BEHN IN THE AMOUNT OF $400.00 PLUS COSTS OF $22.00
Case RIC421732 (11/30/04) - COURT FINDS FOR PLAINTIFF AGAINST CHOZAN G BEHN SR IN THE SUM OF $2,300.00 RENT AND DAMAGES, $350.00 ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS OF $186.00 FOR TOTAL DAMAGES OF $ 2836.00 AND RESTITUTION OF THE PREMISES AT 11295 LAMBERT DR RIVERSIDE CA. 92503.
BETTY CLARK TO BE RESTORED TO THE POSSESSION OF THE PROPERTY. LEASE AGREEMENT FORFEITED
Looks like that last one was later dismissed due to some unlawful detainer or something filed by the defendant's lawyer.
He had a few restraining orders filed against him in this county due to domestic violence complaints (looks like the requests ended up being denied) and some more traffic violations.
Was arrested for PC 243(e)(1) Domestic Battery and PC 273.5(A) Corporal Injury on a Spouse, Cohabitant, or Fellow Parent (inflicting a visible injury) earlier this year, but the case was dismissed after a jury trial was set because the victim refused to show on more than one occasion.
Thanks for the tips about the different counties to look in SnoopyPal. He is definitely no stranger to a court room as a defendant.
Re: nodummy post# 8114 Post # of 12714
I am not at all clear how you are connecting Chozan and his sharing his perspective to being part of an MLM. You are drawing conclusions that are not supported by the evidence.
Chozan is NOT promoting the selling of Petro stock. There is nothing in his communications that even suggests that. He is a shareholder who is sharing his opinion--he is entitled to that. On the other hand you, nodummy, are NOT a shareholder and you are sharing your opinion about Petro stock.
And why are you discussing Iraqi Dinar information on a Petro stock board???
I am sure this post will never see the light of day.... you will be quick to delete it.
Respond | View Replies (2)
