InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockgenius

03/28/11 5:28 PM

#28002 RE: swampdonkey #28000

I do not count to 55 based on the list your provided. Even if I do, these are ad. on two different websites and there are quite a bit of if not all,overlapping, between them. So there is a factor of two.

In the fast growing market in China, people hop jobs a lot, especially the lower level jobs. When one person leaves, naturally you want to hire another one to replace that person.

Dorothy and Jacky are from HK, I doubt their resignation will be even felt by the local staff. And they may not have any friends among the local staff either, so do not expect to see an exodus due to sympathy. There will be none.

Local staff do not care about DTT and board room fight, they care about whether the next month's paycheck is there.

The company could be indeed growing and need the extra staff. I do not think the company has energy to continue to trick us investors any more. What is the point? the trade is halted, we are all prisoners, long and short.

The company either are going to file a plan to comply before March 31, or not. They either are going to hire forensic auditor, or not. They either are going to hire a CFO, or not. Posting multiple local positions is irrelevant at this point. At least for me, that is the case.

The resignation of DTT, Lam and Dong made us all a bit cynical towards the company. Now even some simple job ads are scrutinized as to their true meaning.

If you ask me, the company could still be a fraud. But the CEO is showing up at a Fortune panel discussion, and the company is still hiring. So there is hope.
icon url

bullmarkets

03/28/11 6:16 PM

#28007 RE: swampdonkey #28000

Swampdonkey:

I tend towards #3 too.

Also, someone mentioned that there were fewer than 55 positions named. I just counted 47 named positions.

I believe, however, that "sales" would probably consist of many positions to be filled in a sales department (possibly commission based) and would not just be filled by one person the way CFO would be filled.

Therefore 55 may not be at all unreasonable and the total number of hires presented by the list could prove even greater.

-Andrew