Replies to post #47797 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Ubertino]

I like 100% myself and would prefer that for any cide. It takes time to get there but is achievable, now. Once is only the beginning. The FDA, if they get wind of this, will DEMAND we speed up the applications!! I concur. And Obama, too, in re HIV.

[keltoi]

Just like when Col.Colt came out with the six shooter.

The technology was novel,it was "breakthrough" and it still took time to figure out how to use it most effeciently.
Takes time to learn to shoot a quarter in mid air.

NNVC is "breakthrough",novel,it works.But it still takes time to learn how to harness it most effectively too.

For those who complain about "HOW LONG THIS IS TAKING",I realize some have been in it for 5 years and bought in at $.20-.50.

I'd gladly trade places with whoever you are in a New York Second.

Anyone who want's to take me up on this offer speak up now.

Kelt

[noretreat]

Edit for Gary R (running out of posts) Of course it's corruption. This is the good ole' USA. Have a banana!

Doc, your last few posts are confusing.

By almost any standard, today's action showed little direction on light volume. If the objective were to keep swing traders from trading, mission accomplished. But what kind of objective is that? What about maximizing shareholder value over the long term?

Secondly, I need more data to really see what the differences were between the last two studies. It seems clear that the discussion of 4x efficacy came from somewhere...but we don't know where...yet. And now that this is in, there is no excuse for further delay, is there?? If we go the FDA promptly (pre-IND pr'd by 6/30) with flucide, I promise not to call the search for perfection foolish any more!!

I just don't get all the concern over shorts and swing traders. They are a part of life and are not going away. If you think they are a nuisance now, watch what happens when this thing runs up to all-time highs.