InvestorsHub Logo

Makamai

03/19/11 4:16 PM

#223723 RE: joecanouse #223722

First, you wouldn't know what "transparency" means even if it came around and bit you in the okole...documents you have posted are full of nothing but lies and falsehoods.
Second, Jeff has been doing an awesome job "cleaning up the company and sweeping out the trash" to the satisfaction of all "real" shareholders and certainly doesn't need your help!! I'm sure you may not like it, but its obvious your ego is going to be your downfall and you are going to get caught in your own mouse trap real soon...and you can take that to the bank, er rather the jail cell.

Makamai

doughboy2

03/19/11 4:42 PM

#223732 RE: joecanouse #223722

you don't think jeff has tried to cleanup the books and get us current?

B*A*N*K*E*R

03/19/11 5:09 PM

#223739 RE: joecanouse #223722

Thats exactly what will happen once the clowns are put to bed....you think that is not what is going to happen? See by doing the way we are doing it we get both, clowns gone and all cleaned up...we are stupid enough to give it back to the clowns...what reasonable person would do that?

T.

nutinbutdatroof

03/19/11 7:12 PM

#223777 RE: joecanouse #223722

would you not agree that it would make sense to clean up the company and get transparency while everything is being hashed out? what objection would any reasonable person have to that?


Personally I'm like you and would generally not support a knee jerk reactions like this merger without first knowing what I own. But based on the apparent sea of slime balls involved in this scam called QASP, and given all the white knight candidates, I'm beginning to lean in Mr. Owen's direction as a custodian for QASP, provided Mr. DiGenova isn't rewarded.

I don't think for a minute what you offer would ever be executed. My gut tells me you and the others would just use the opportunity to cleanup any loose ends.

While you're here I've got a couple of questions

1. Why do you have multiple companies dealing with QASP?

2. Why is one your companies making the loan and the other getting preferred shares? What did Carpathia LLC do to deserve preferred shares?

3. Why does the resolutions for the shareholders and BOD meeting on 1-27-11 report the available shares was increased to 5 billion but the Colorado SOS filing for that meeting states the A/S was raised to only 3 billion?

4. Assuming Mr. Bradley's trust represented approximately 75% ownership (votes), why was Carpathia's LLC votes needed to change the BOD?