Replies to post #92384 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[AStTropaz]

mahatmapaul, to further what you are saying, every PR EXPO puts out seems to somehow fall short. Interesting how often this seems to happen. Hmmmm, just create another shiny lure and raise the A/S, there are plenty of fish in the sea. AJMHO

[Santa Barbara Broker]

mahatmapaul...one problem with that. "Companies" can't enter into agreements that aren't written.

" *** The company (Expo Holdings) has entered into an agreement"

If there was an "agreement" made by the company, it has to be recorded somewhere. If it isn't there was no "agreement". There may have been what JD Brown considered an "agreement" because of some conversation he had with a person who, unfortunately, is no longer with us, but it was neither an agreement or a contract if it wasn't written. His use of the word "entered" could also provide him an out. "Entered" could be argued to signify that the "agreement" was still in it's initial stages and hadn't yet been recorded. In which case it could be referred to as an "agreement" but still not actually represent the true definition of one.

PRs are the con man's canvas and easel. The words are their paint. I have always found it's where a person who usually isn't much good at anything else besides misleading and conning people produce their finest (and usually only) work. There is also a side benefit in Expo's case...it gives supporters and associates a flag around which to rally and spread the misinformation ;-). All IMHO.

SBB