InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

steve5

03/16/11 7:59 AM

#2915 RE: palmspringsbum #2912

You are being somewhat unequivocal on your assumptions Palms, remember there are multiple probabilities for everything (not to mention infinite possibilities), unless you have the proof in your hand.

Regarding Mr. Shenher's post. It is a common practice (most folks don't know about) that people in a position of relative power usually use "BUZZ" words to let 'awakened' people to know what they are doing in advance. So that could mean 'exactly' what it says....or not!

My post related to Mr. Shenher's "Hints" on his second post on the year, are not affirmations, but a personal believe that has some meaning other than the 'obvious' one. It may be purely coincidental, but last time, his first post of the year, fitted the occasion if you were paying close attention. Again, that is just my personal opinion, and I respect your view point.

It just seems too odd to me he is posting, so far only twice (this year), first one before the Montana announcement, so if in the next few days, we have news that could put CPOW on "STEROIDS" that could be the "BUZZ" word for me. He is using the main events at the moments to 'dress' them, at that time Charlie Sheen, and now, the Japan event.

Why he didn't post before the previous news?, my guess is, he was working on the deals and not so sure of closing them, my opinion is he now has the confidence (or maybe certainty?) the deals will close (or are closed already).

Regarding the posts about the split shares, I posted also my opinion, if you think there is something more 'fishy' to it on the part of Mr. Shenher, I wish you could provide not evidence, but at least more solid arguments in order to make such assumptions.


So you mention Occam's razor, assuming your opinion is the more logical one, it is for you, and I respect that, but not for me, "plausible deniability” is a far cry, in my opinion, to hold the title for the more logical explanation in this case.

I’m not Mr. Shenher’s defender, but base my opinions on the stream of events, and that negative explanation for the split shares simply doesn't fit the flow of facts and circumstances driving CPOW to its current coordinates, IMHO.

Wish you all a great day!, Mr. Junlie, are you already here?