Replies to post #40446 on One World Ventures Inc. (OWVI)

[cpw13154]

What? So your saying its OK to repost old PR'S and change dates to make them seem current. Its ok to pull what is good news from a PR and omit the negetive parts of the same PR! My concern is not with current shareholders as they have had ample time to move on this at a much higher price and chose not to. I just don't want newbies to be fooled by old posts,old buisness. If they look at the new posts and the past and see how badly this company has done and decide to still invest OK. How am I speculating on the old OWVI being ka-put. Did we not have a PR stateing that they were gettting out of the retail card buisness. Did they not say they were going to sell off Tutamen? Thats the proof I have they told us as much.
As for showing the good and the bad if it was left up to most we would still be waiting on the bank news or the audit even though we know they are not coming. So if I see posts that bring out old posts that have long been dead and burried I will continue to bring that to everyones attention OKIE DOKIE

[Kansas City Pete]

Captain,

I agree, sprinkle a little lemonade on the negative, accentuate the positive.

I would do anything to facilitate, promote, and market this stock if he would return my clals and tell me what is going on.

Until there are consistent PR's. How can anyone believe anything otherwise when we dont know what is going on?

If this will be a business to business social networking site, so be it. Bring it. Do it, show it. So it is so.

The core of my business is predicated upon doing things in a professional and businesslike manner. He needs to do the same.
Return a call.

[stark12]

I could not agree more. At least we have some new DD on OWVI, but we get the same recycled criticisms.

Can we give Ron a chance to move the company forward? Is anyone opposed to shareholders of OWVI making a profit?