Replies to post #24221 on China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc. (fka CCME)

[swampdonkey]

i dont see that comment on Bills site

[HighPlainSfinkter]

Where do you see that? WTCBills care to comment?+

[T-R1]

IF they resigned I still think that there is more to it because it's not a reason to halt.
IF that's the case, the management must be formulating corrective action and they will release bad and good news at the same time.
Still though, I don't understand how could they resign so far into the audit and especially since it's their second year. And why wouldn't they officially report it?

[Wilde]

Even if DT doesn't resign as some speculations, the big name auditors have been working with BIG monies as always. They don't work for their customers -- actually they always take advantages over their customers and work with some powers.

[chensiona]

This whole thing reeks of manipulation to me. Just looking at all the puts $10 and below, almost like it was known from the start that DT would resign in the very last days, if it is indeed true.

[bullmarkets]

see my last three messages to get full context of what I am saying I read on WCTBILLS blog.

-Andrew

[marchjuly]

Deloitte found nothing. Yet there are theories there might be something they can not find (example as shown in WCTbills blog). They are coward do not want to risk Deloitte's brand getting involved.

Or Deloitte becomes part of the manipulation as somebody else suggested.

I think WCTbills' suggestion regarding tender offer is the best strategy for now.