You write" capitalizing on human tragedy that's how low w2 energy will go " , when i think you meant to write " that's how high W2Energy will strive to prevent human tragedy " Shame on anything for trying to stop something , that could "prevent human tragedy", like W2Energy
I read that his post and thought. WOW. That was quick. And horribly low. If tragedy strikes the imaginary W2 plant in the year 2050, all the oil nuts are going to say "If you would have just stuck with Oil those people wouldn't have been injured" I would hope SOMETHING is sacred, but I'm pretty sure the defender of all things W2 has no depth he won't go to hammer in his point.