goldstandard, disingenuous or totally missed by you .. "unprecedented" means before that .. you know .. like
compared to Clinton and/or before him .. so what happened after Bush has no relevance to that piece at all.
Putting aside that your simple FACT is invalid to further the nonsense of your reply is your suggestion
"All i have to do is disprove your Beck derangement syndrome with yet again, a simple FACT"
is ludicrous, and suggests you would you treat an infected population of many by inoculating only one. Then you miss the arm in the one attempt.
The facts stand .. Beck misrepresents, distorts and lies, and you just refuse to acknowledge it.
Beck admits as much himself when he said he does not check facts, yet you say you like him for what he admits he does not provide .. FACTS ..
Deal with that. Big deal? NO. Your 'fudge' did not surprise.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
