Replies to post #22858 on China MediaExpress Holdings, Inc. (fka CCME)

[Kelvin2005]

Thanks for sharing. It is really disappointing though.

As a long, the most annoying thing is not the short basher but those shameless pumpers under the pretense of wishful thinking and day dreaming.

All the concerns or different opinions are relentless scolded by some faithfully longs, which is the most ominous sign with this stock.

[dawgpac68]

Yikes. I may be grasping at straws here but she denies representing "China Media Enterprises". Did she key it in wrong or is China Media EXPRESS really not a client? CCME is definitely a roller coaster but I have complete faith in wctbills and the other longs contributing their due diligence. Time will tell. GLTA.

[Millstone]

Thanks ChinHao. From this reply, it is clear that F-H has been engaged by CCME, just not in the role of public spokesperson.

Otherwise, they would not have stated: "please direct
your inquiry to the Company's IR email address [e-mail]"

Were they not engaged by CCME, F-H would not have referred anybody to this specific CCME IR email address. They would have either not responded, or said that CCME is not a client, period.

Millstone

[tenenbaum]

Doesn't that email actually confirm a relationship exists?

Otherwise, why would they point you to a company email address? Also, why would they then not state that they have no relationship with the company?

[Doofenshmirtz Evil Inc]

Right after Chicken announced it I called F-H corporate headquarters and the secretary said the same thing. Apparently numerous people called her the same day and concluded they had no relationship with CCME.

[UpstateChris]

Dear Mr Chen,

Thank you for your email.

Fleishman-Hillard does not act in a public spokesperson role for
investors or media on behalf of China Media Enterprises, please direct
your inquiry to the Company's IR email address [e-mail] .

Best Regards

Rene Fang
Fleishman-Hillard | Digital. Integrated. Global.

As a security consultant who uses email, amoung other techniques, to try to get people to give me information they should not, I have sent and received many emails like this. This one has two fundamental flaws.

First - if a company did not represent another company they would still most likely not say anything, but they would never provide you with the email address of who to contact. How would they know? Why would they bother?

Second, let's say they were feeling generous and did actually look up CCME (since it is not their client they would have to do some research) it is highly unlikely they would give you the WRONG email like in your "email". The correct and very easy to find email is [e-mail], not @ccme.com.

In other words - your posting is completely fabricated. Nice try.