IMO, I'm leaning toward believing in a positive outcome for ICOA shareholders. It appears that both you and wiinvestor believe that the lack of evidence for my belief does NOT bode well for ICOA shareholders. But the truth of the matter is that neither I NOR you and wiinvestor have any evidence to prove either side is correct. Lack of evidence is not proof, it's merely a source for further negative conjecture. I, however, choose to conjecture to the positive side.
Can either side, at this point, prove otherwise?
So, I continue to enjoy reading your continuing saga of negative concerns. I would, however, enjoy your ongoing saga even more if it were couched in terms of true skepticism as opposed to serious negativity.
Last time I checked, there WAS a difference.
Yet Again, Said With The Highest Regards,
plmcc