InvestorsHub Logo

Basser1

03/05/11 6:12 PM

#91617 RE: Kapla #91616

Wanna bet that all these links get ignored because they didn't come directly from someone driving by on Shaver Street on a "factfinding mission"???? After all how accurate could the SEC be when all the really good DD material comes from somebody driving by at 60MPH!!! LOL!!!

JMHO

Basser

fourkids_9pets

03/05/11 8:31 PM

#91618 RE: Kapla #91616

notice the *date* of those audited fins covering 2005/2006

October 15, 2007

notice the time frame outlined ~

In May of 2006, the Company did a 250:1 reverse stock split and changed its name from Advantage Technologies, Inc. to
Expo Holdings, Inc. The new shares issued from this split totaled 187,156 shares. The company then acquired all of the
outstanding stock of D&D Displays, Inc. in exchange for 40,000,000 (forty million) shares of stock in the Company (Expo
Holdings, Inc.). Additional shares were issued in the Company for settlement of an outstanding promissory note totaling
7,079,808 shares. A total of 470,192 shares were issued for services rendered.



===

now from the initial disclosure from jan 2007


May 12, 2006, Advantage Technologies, Inc. acquired D & D Displays and filed
Articles of Exchange in the State of Nevada. A Certificate of Amendment was also
filed on May 12, 2006 changing the name of the corporation to Expo Holdings, Inc.
D& D Displays was incorporated in the State of North Carolina on December 14,
2000.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=11431

that was the prior *co.* (AT) that did that r/s as part
of d&d coming public into their shell

as i understand it co. <expo> actually did a froward split
which i remember being the subject of this board a few years back .. folks with search can find posts if interested

btw
i truly doubt jd had a clue then what a shell *trading* on
the grays meant .. to me *today* it screams of FTDS' never
cleaned up
.. and most likely prior owners of AT shell
selling shares given as part of the transaction .. either
directly or loaning offshore for 2 X face value to be shorted against <if restricted>

it seems to be SOP .. i think there were 3 of them but that
is from memory going back 2.5 years .. i just know that AT
didn't file squat with the sec or pink sheets .. like so many
other unregistered co.s .. hmmmm

that makes expo rather unique on that level .. it's clear
that mgmt intended to uplist from the otc to the then otc bb
(hence) audited fins .. sure hope they are wiser today ;-)

===

regardless anyone with interest can access the steps
of the process from current mgmt (it's publicly disseminated)

==

(for new eyes) the co. started trading on the pinks on 6/7/2007

POST

this board started 7 days later (see date above)

at the time the SS was the same in jan 2007

POST

503M OS (1 Billion AS) 73M float

Item 5: The Par or Stated Value of the Security.
One Billion (1,000,000,000), par value $0.001 shares of common stock authorized in
the company’s Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed with the
State of Nevada on August 8, 2006.


page 2 LINK JAN 30, 2007

jd and glenn held 104M+ per
KM held 125M

again folks with interest can contact jd and ask ~ this is
all public info and can be clearly explained to anyone
with interest or folks can go back and read this board
from the beginning since this topic was discussed previously
a few times over


======

i do find it rather fascinating that for an unregistered
co. on the OTC .. that EXPO HOLDINGS is remarkably *TRANSPARENT*

fins are all there except for 2010 :)

forms aren't .. but i don't see any other co.s out there
filing those either at this level

the SS is downright small .. particularly since those of
us who actually did the DD .. know exactly why the AS had
to be raised in the first place

the TA is ungagged .. NV SOS is kept up to date (not in
default like a few others out there)

mgmt issues pr's and updates sparingly

but most telling to me .. is total lack of volume with a
pps of 0001

i'm not sure what the ISSUE IS RE: A MC OF 325,000

i don't have a problem with it until T squared comes about

==
4kids
all jmo